kevadesu/costmikuSearch
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Icycoide/searxng
Code Pull requests Activity

[fix] remove broken ? search operator

Browse source 
The ? search operator has been broken for some time and
currently only raises the question why it's still there.

## Context ##

The query "Paris !images" searches for "Paris" in the "images" category.

Once upon a time Searx supported "Paris ?images" to search for "Paris"
in the currently enabled categories and the "images" category.

The feature makes sense ... the ? syntax does not.
We will hopefully introduce a +!images syntax in the future.

Fixes #702.
This commit is contained in:
Martin Fischer 2022-01-06 13:45:25 +01:00
parent 03189d60f4
commit 61935c72ef
4 changed files with 5 additions and 16 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/admin/engines/settings.rst
View file

@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ engine is shown. Most of the options have a default value or even are optional.
search engine.
``shortcut`` :
Code used to execute bang requests (in this case using ``!bi`` or ``?bi``)
Code used to execute bang requests (in this case using ``!bi``)
``base_url`` : optional
Part of the URL that should be stable across every request. Can be useful to

3
docs/user/search_syntax.rst
View file

@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ Prefix ``!``
Prefix: ``:``
to set language
Prefix: ``?``
to add engines and categories to the currently selected categories
Abbrevations of the engines and languages are also accepted. Engine/category
modifiers are chainable and inclusive (e.g. with :search:`!it !ddg !wp qwer
<?q=%21it%20%21ddg%20%21wp%20qwer>` search in IT category **and** duckduckgo