mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2025-09-17 11:08:39 +02:00
1879 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
forgejo-backport-action
|
d4c9c01f2d |
[v12.0/forgejo] fix: cancelled or skipped runs are not failures for notifications (#8404)
Some checks failed
/ release (push) Has been cancelled
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Has been cancelled
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Has been cancelled
testing / backend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / frontend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-unit (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-e2e (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-mysql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-pgsql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-sqlite (push) Has been cancelled
testing / security-check (push) Has been cancelled
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8366 From the point of view of a notification, the only status which must be considered a fail is `StatusFailure`. All others are either success `StatusSuccess` or undetermined `StatusCancelled` and `StatusSkipped`. Those are the only four status in which a run can be when it reaches the `ActionRunNowDone` function because it is filtered on `IsDone` which is only true for those. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. ### Documentation - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8404 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
forgejo-backport-action
|
d1bb75eea0 |
[v12.0/forgejo] fix: disable Forgejo Actions email notifications on recovery (#8390)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8374 - Make the migration to add an index a noop - do not remove it as it would break v12.next & v13.next - Keep the logic that relies on finding the last run, only always fail to find which is the same as assuming each run is one of a kind Refs forgejo/forgejo#8373 Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8390 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
forgejo-backport-action
|
b2125a774e |
[v12.0/forgejo] fix(ui): Add pasted images to dropzone (#8362)
Some checks failed
/ release (push) Has been cancelled
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Has been cancelled
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Has been cancelled
testing / backend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / frontend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-unit (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-e2e (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-mysql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-pgsql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-sqlite (push) Has been cancelled
testing / security-check (push) Has been cancelled
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7749 This adds pasted images to the dropzone. To provide the same experience as when using the dropzone. This gives the possibility to preview and delete the image. Additionally it provides a copy button to copy the markdown code for inserting the image. Fixes #4588 Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8362 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
forgejo-backport-action
|
5f88d15a63 |
[v12.0/forgejo] fix: pass doer's ID for CRUD instance signing (#8318)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8304 - When doing CRUD actions, the commiter and author are reconstructed and do not contain the doer's ID. Make sure to pass this ID along so it can be used to verify the rules of instance signing for CRUD actions. - Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7693. It seems that previously this didn't work correctly as it would not care about a empty ID. - Resolves forgejo/forgejo#8278 Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8318 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
Earl Warren
|
cf4d0e6c34 |
bug: unify RepoActionRun and ActionRun structs (#8250)
Two pull requests were merged at the same time - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7699 - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7508 And added conflicting structs ActionRun modules/structs. That broke the forgejo development branch and a quick fix was made to resolve the name conflict. - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8066 However that creates an undesirable duplication of two structures that serve the same purpose but are different. - Remove RepoActionRun and replace it with ActionRun - convert.ToActionRun has one more argument, the doer, because it is determined differently in the context of webhooks or API ### Tests - No need because the two pull requests involved already have good coverage. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8250 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
b2c4fc9f94 |
bug: Forgejo Actions email notifications are opt-in (#8242)
* Add the `notify-email` column / NotifyEmail to ActionRun and set it: * services/actions/workflows.go `Dispatch` * services/actions/schedule_tasks.go `CreateScheduleTask` * services/actions/notifier_helper.go `handleWorkflows` * Only send an email if the workflow has `enable-email-notifications: true` by having `MailActionRun` return immediately if `NotifyEmail` is false. * Ignore or silently fail on `enable-email-notifications: true` parsing errors. Reporting such errors belongs in workflow validation, not when it is evaluated for the notifications. * Add unit and integration tests. Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8187 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. ### Documentation - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8242 Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
9e6f722f94 |
fix: only send Forgejo Actions notifications to one user (#8227)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- If the run was attributed to a system user (which is the case for scheduled runs for instance), ignore it and fallback to the mail of the owner. System users may have email addresses, but they are not to be used. - If the owner is a system user or an organization with no email associated with it, do nothing. - If a user with an email exists, check if they did not disable notifications and send the email. Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8187 Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8233 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. ### Documentation - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8227 Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
Michael Jerger
|
25d596d387 |
Federated user activity following: Isolated model changes (#8078)
This PR is part of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4767 This should not have an outside impact but bring all model changes needed & bring migrations. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8078 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de> Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de> |
||
oliverpool
|
f708bacfff |
blob: use NewTruncatedReader for CodeOwners parsing
tested in tests/integration/pull_review_test.go:TestPullView_CodeOwner |
||
|
Michael Jerger
|
15bb6b7f92 |
[gitea] week 2025-22 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo) (#8198)
## Checklist - [x] go to the last cherry-pick PR (forgejo/forgejo#8040) to figure out how far it went: [gitea@d5bbaee64e]( |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
adc273e3a8 |
fix: do not ignore automerge while a PR is checking for conflicts (#8189)
Automerge can be ignored when the following race happens: * Conflict check is happening on a repository and `pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusChecking` for all open pull requests (this happens every time a pull request is merged). * While the conflict check is ongoing, an event (Forgejo Actions being successful for instance) happens and and `StartPRCheckAndAutoMerge*` is called. * Because `pr.CanAutoMerge()` is false, the pull request is not selected and not added to the automerge queue. * When the conflict check completes and `pr.CanAutoMerge()` becomes true, there no longer is a task in the auto merge queue and the auto merge does not happen. This is fixed by adding a task to the auto merge queue when the conflict check for a pull request completes. This is done when the mutx protecting the conflict check task is released to prevent a deadlock when a synchronous queues are used in the following situation: * the conflict check task finds the pull request is mergeable * it schedules the auto merge tasks that finds it must be merged * merging concludes with scheduling a conflict check task Avoid an extra loop where a conflict check task queues an auto merge task that will schedule a conflict check task if the pull request can be merged. The auto merge row is removed from the database before merging. It would otherwise be removed after the merge commit is received via the git hook which happens asynchronously and can lead to a race. StartPRCheckAndAutoMerge is modified to re-use HeadCommitID when available, such as when called after a pull request conflict check. --- A note on tests: they cover the new behavior, i.e. automerge being triggered by a successful conflict check. This is also on the critical paths for every test that involve creating, merging or updating a pull request. - `tests/integration/git_test.go` - `tests/integration/actions_commit_status_test.go` - `tests/integration/api_helper_for_declarative_test.go` - `tests/integration/patch_status_test.go` - `tests/integration/pull_merge_test.go` The [missing fixture file](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189/files#diff-b86fdd79108b3ba3cb2e56ffcfd1be2a7b32f46c) for the auto merge table can be verified to be necessary simply by removing it an observing that the integration tests fail. The [scheduling of the auto merge task](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189/files#diff-9489262e93967f6bb2db41837f37c06f4e70d978) in `testPR` can be verified to be required by moving it in the `testPRProtected` function and observing that the tests hang forever because of the deadlock. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189): <!--number 8189 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZG8gbm90IGlnbm9yZSBhdXRvbWVyZ2Ugd2hpbGUgYSBQUiBpcyBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgY29uZmxpY3Rz-->do not ignore automerge while a PR is checking for conflicts<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
|
oliverpool
|
a4ea74020f | feat: API GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/blobs | ||
|
oliverpool
|
07e8684a61 | api: GitBlob consistent naming | ||
Renovate Bot
|
90d67cf421 |
Update module gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go to v0.130.1 (forgejo) (#8163)
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go) | require | minor | `v0.129.0` -> `v0.130.1` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>gitlab-org/api/client-go (gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go)</summary> ### [`v0.130.1`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go/tags/v0.130.1) [Compare Source](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go/compare/v0.130.0...v0.130.1) #### [0.130.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go/compare/v0.130.0...v0.130.1) (2025-06-11) ##### Bug Fixes * add missing nil check on create group with avatar ([3298a05]( |
||
|
oliverpool
|
c93eb1f927 |
API: enforce sha requirement on POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents (#8139)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Currently the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents` API endpoint accepts request without any `ChangeFileOperation.SHA`, unlike stated by the doc:
|
||
John Moon
|
b2b039b6e7 |
fix: allow instance API URLs in release assets (#7644)
Currently, if you try to add an "external" link to a release in Forgejo, the validation code checks for basic URL soundness and then specifically checks that the URL is not an API URL. In some cases, it may make sense to link to instance API URLs (like when you want to create a release that links to several different repos' packages). Relax this check so it only validates basic URL soundness. Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7598 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. See: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1161 ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7644): <!--number 7644 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWxsb3cgaW5zdGFuY2UgQVBJIFVSTHMgaW4gcmVsZWFzZSBhc3NldHM=-->allow instance API URLs in release assets<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7644 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Malte Jürgens <maltejur@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com> Co-committed-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com> |
||
Julian Schlarb
|
a8e375eb28 |
fix: omit Content-Length on 307 redirects when serving direct manifest for containers (#8037)
Containers have been refactored to use the same serve method as other packages, ensuring consistent response handling. fixes #7888 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8037): <!--number 8037 --><!--line 0 --><!--description b21pdCBDb250ZW50LUxlbmd0aCBvbiAzMDcgcmVkaXJlY3RzIHdoZW4gc2VydmluZyBkaXJlY3QgbWFuaWZlc3QgZm9yIGNvbnRhaW5lcnM=-->omit Content-Length on 307 redirects when serving direct manifest for containers<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8037 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> Co-committed-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> |
||
|
Julian Schlarb
|
4b6ccbd631 |
feat: auto cleanup of offline runners (#7803)
Some checks failed
/ release (push) Has been cancelled
testing / backend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / frontend-checks (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-unit (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-e2e (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-mysql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-pgsql (push) Has been cancelled
testing / test-sqlite (push) Has been cancelled
testing / security-check (push) Has been cancelled
Fixes #7646 Adds a cron job to cleanup action runners that have been offline or inactive for X amount of time. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7803 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> Co-committed-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
2529923dea |
fix: rename api.{List,}ActionRun to api.{List,}RepoActionRun (#8066)
This variable name conflict happened because both https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7699 and https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7508 introduced the same names in different places and were merged at the same time. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8066 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
christopher-besch
|
d17aa98262 |
Actions Failure, Succes, Recover Webhooks (#7508)
Implement Actions Success, Failure and Recover webhooks for Forgejo, Gitea, Gogs, Slack, Discord, DingTalk, Telegram, Microsoft Teams, Feishu / Lark Suite, Matrix, WeCom (Wechat Work), Packagist. Some of these webhooks have not been manually tested. Implement settings for these new webhooks. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7508): <!--number 7508 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWN0aW9ucyBGYWlsdXJlLCBTdWNjZXMsIFJlY292ZXIgV2ViaG9va3M=-->Actions Failure, Succes, Recover Webhooks<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7508 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
|
Renovate Bot
|
6ce9d764bc |
Update module code.forgejo.org/f3/gof3/v3 to v3.11.0 (forgejo) (#8056)
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | code.forgejo.org/f3/gof3/v3 | require | minor | `v3.10.8` -> `v3.11.0` | --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - On day 1 of the month, every 3 months ( * * 1 */3 * ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MC40MC4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDAuNDAuMCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19--> Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8056 Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org> Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org> |
||
Antonin Delpeuch
|
0ed7237b12 |
[gitea] Always use an empty line to separate the commit message and trailer (#8041)
This is a port of a gitea PR: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34512. I have added some copy-editing commits on top for cleanliness. I haven't tested the changes manually and only relied on the existing automated test. ## Checklist ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Co-authored-by: Jim Lin <jim@andestech.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8041 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> Co-committed-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> |
||
klausfyhn
|
fc35915a28 |
feat: make action runs available in api (#7699)
## Summary Inspired by https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository and https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-workflow-run ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7699): <!--number 7699 --><!--line 0 --><!--description bWFrZSBhY3Rpb24gcnVucyBhdmFpbGFibGUgaW4gYXBp-->make action runs available in api<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7699 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@gmail.com> |
||
Earl Warren
|
55d8910255 |
chore(upgrade): urfave/cli from v2 to v3 (#8035)
Some checks failed
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Integration tests for the release process / release-simulation (push) Has been cancelled
/ release (push) Waiting to run
urfave/cli v2 will eventually become unmaintained, switch over to v3 which is the latest supported version. Note: the `docs` command would be a lot of work to restore with v3 ([the package is still in alpha](https://github.com/urfave/cli-docs)) An alternative to avoid a breaking change would be to not upgrade from v2 to v3 for that reason alone. Note: these commits were cherry-picked from https://code.forgejo.org/forgefriends/forgefriends Note: it is best reviewed side by side with no display of whitespace changes (there are a lot of those when converting vars to func). - a few functional changes were necessary and are noted in context in the file changes tab - https://cli.urfave.org/migrate-v2-to-v3/ upgrade instructions were followed in the most minimal way possible - upgrade gof3 to v3.10.8 which includes and upgrade from urfave/cli v2 to urfave/cli v3 - upgrade gitlab.com/gitlab-org/api/client-go v0.129.0 because it is an indirect dependency of gof3 and requires a change because of a deprecated field that otherwise triggers a lint error but nothing else otherwise - verified that the [script](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/src/branch/next/scripts/cli-docs.sh) that generates the [CLI documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/src/branch/next/scripts/cli-docs.sh) still works. There are cosmetic differences and the **help** subcommand is no longer advertised (although it is still supported) but the `--help` option is advertised as expected so it is fine. - end-to-end tests [passed](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/667) (they use the Forgejo CLI to some extent) ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Breaking features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8035): <!--number 8035 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->The `forgejo docs` command is deprecated and CLI errors are now displayed on stderr instead of stdout. These breaking changes happened because the package used to parse the command line arguments was [upgraded from v2 to v3](https://cli.urfave.org/migrate-v2-to-v3/). A [separate project was initiated](https://github.com/urfave/cli-docs) to re-implement the `docs` command, but it is not yet production ready.<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8035 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
Julian Schlarb
|
dec17ba704 |
fix: camel and pascal case transformer (#8034)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Fixes: #7853 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8034 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> Co-committed-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> |
||
|
Julian Schlarb
|
21151ea5ce |
fix: maven use groupId:artifactId for package name concatenation (#6352)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Second part of #6327 to fix the Maven package naming. This pull request includes: * Changing the group and artifact IDs from being separated by `-` to `:` as suggested by [Maven](https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates). * Making Maven package names case-sensitive * Migrating the database to: * Handle collisions of package names (e.g., groupId: foo- with artifactId: bar and groupId: foo with artifactId: -bar) by moving them into their own packages. * Fix the missing group ID issue (#6329). * Update lower_name to match the name value for maven pkgs to make it case-sensetive. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6352 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> Co-committed-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de> |
||
Maks1mS
|
8e2747859b |
fix: ensure consistent empty repository topics field (#7920)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Resolves #7878 An empty repository topic was not stored consistently across databases, this caused the `ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS` feature to not work correctly. Always store empty repository topics as an empty array to fix this. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7920 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Maks1mS <maks1ms@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Maks1mS <maks1ms@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
chavacava
|
99d697263f |
chore(cleanup): replaces unnecessary calls to formatting functions by non-formatting equivalents (#7994)
This PR replaces unnecessary calls to formatting functions (`fmt.Printf`, `fmt.Errorf`, ...) by non-formatting equivalents. Resolves #7967 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7994 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: chavacava <chavacava@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: chavacava <chavacava@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
Gusted
|
7d2a7b8559 |
feat: add validating user password as trace region (#7981)
- Password hashing can take a measurable amount of time, make this more visible in the trace by capturing the computations done in the password hash in their own region. - Ref: forgejo/forgejo#6470 ## Screenshot  The upper part are where the tasks are shown (and nothing else). The bottom part is where the interesting execution tracing happens and the part where the user password hashing happens is now properly indicated/highlighted and does not need to be inferred by looking at the stack traces. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7981 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
|
Gusted
|
62ec469394 |
feat: replace go-rpmutils library with our own (#7953)
- While doing cross-compiling of Forgejo (with CGO enabled) it was noticed that besides compiling sqlite3, github.com/DataDog/zstd (a CGO wrapper around the reference zstd library) took a long time to compile. Upon investigating why this library was included in the first place I concluded that this library is not even used and compiling this package is a waste of time and CPU cycles. - https://github.com/sassoftware/go-rpmutils is the library that uses the CGO zstd library, and would use it the pure Go variant (https://github.com/klauspost/compress/zstd) if CGO is enabled (which is the default). It uses zstd to uncompress the payload of a RPM packages. This is a operation that Forgejo does not use in the slightest, hence being unused code. - It is not possible to force compiling the pure Go variant if CGO is enabled. Therefore forking and removing this code is the only option to avoid compiling the zstd C library. The changes made to the fork can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/go-rpmutils/compare/2660c86d578cd2a5366fe5bda488e37f9ab1b11a...v1.0.0 - Via [actiongraph](https://github.com/icio/actiongraph) you can precisely see where the Go compiler is spending time, on a beefy machine the compilation takes of the zstd C library takes ~40s. For reference compiling the sqlite3 C library takes ~50s. - The forgejo binary (build via `make backend`) reduced its size by 835776 bytes (0.8 MiB). TL;DR forked library to remove unused code to avoid Go spending a considerable amount of time compiling the reference zstd library that in the end is never used. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7953): <!--number 7953 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cmVwbGFjZSBnby1ycG11dGlscyBsaWJyYXJ5IHdpdGggb3VyIG93bg==-->replace go-rpmutils library with our own<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7953 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
|
Gusted
|
b2a3966e64 |
feat: remove API authentication methods that uses the URL query (#7924)
- They have been marked as deprecated since 2023 and adequate warnings have been given about this method being deprecated, remove it for Forgejo v12. - For clarity: the reason they are deprecated is that these methods allow authentication material to be given via a URL query. This results in the authentication material being logged, which is undesired behavior. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7924 Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
|
Antonin Delpeuch
|
d2fce8360c |
fix: Add error reporting to PRs with invalid workflows (#7930)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Hello all, I am finally taking the time to follow-up on #6277 to get this implemented :) ## Checklist ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7930): <!--number 7930 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWRkIGVycm9yIHJlcG9ydGluZyB0byBQUnMgd2l0aCBpbnZhbGlkIHdvcmtmbG93cw==-->Add error reporting to PRs with invalid workflows<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7930 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> Co-committed-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> |
||
|
Gusted
|
fa2a135f68 |
chore: QoL improvements to tests (#7917)
- Use mock helper functions, instead of home-brew solutions. - Disable cron jobs that are not important to be run during integration tests and might even interfere. - Avoid sleeping unnecessary, if there's some requirement then sleep or retry until that requirement is met. - Avoid trying to deliver webhooks that will always result in a failure. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7917 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
floss4good
|
dc56486b1f |
feat!: Abusive content reporting (#6977)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
This implements milestones 1. and 4. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): > 1. A reporting feature is implemented in the database. It ensures that content remains available for review, even if a user deletes it after a report was sent. > 4. Users can report the most relevant content types (at least: issue comments, repositories, users) ### See also: - forgejo/discussions#291 - forgejo/discussions#304 - forgejo/design#30 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6977 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> |
||
|
Gusted
|
7c150be23d |
feat: improved performances when checking for conflicts on pull requests (#7727)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- `testPatch` is a function that is called to test a pull request and determine the state of the pull request. Checking for merge conflicts, check if the diff is empty and if the pull request modifies any protected files. - The checking for merge conflict and if the diff is empty used git commands that relied on a working tree to correctly functions. Forgejo store repositories in a bare format which do not contain a working tree. This means that a temporary copy was created every time a pull request had to be re-checked and for large repositories involving quite some I/O interaction. - This patch adjusts those codepaths to instead use newer Git plumbing commands that work without requiring a work tree and can thus be used directly on the bare repository. The merge conflict is now done via [`git-merge-tree(1)`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge-tree/) and checking if the diff is empty is done via [`git-diff-tree(1)`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-diff-tree). - If the function is called to test a patch where the head and base repository are not the same, then [Git alternate](https://git-scm.com/docs/gitglossary#Documentation/gitglossary.txt-aiddefalternateobjectdatabaseaalternateobjectdatabase) is used to make the head commit available in the base repository, this done on a per git command basis via the `GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES` environment. - As far as I can understand the documentation and the existing code, there's no edge case that the new code cannot handle. It also results in a cleaner codepath, as the existing code did a lot of checking and merging in a more traditional approach that required a lot of (parsing) code, while the new code offloads this to git and has a trivial parser of the output. - Resolves forgejo/forgejo#7701 - Added exhaustive integration testing. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7727 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
Maxim Slipenko
|
b22bea8b45 |
fix: remove redundant permission check in RemoveLabel (#7835)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Closes #2415 Permissions checks are already done by the callee, which also do more correct permission checks. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7835 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Maxim Slipenko <maks1ms@altlinux.org> Co-committed-by: Maxim Slipenko <maks1ms@altlinux.org> |
||
Leni Kadali
|
f4af3191ef |
fix: cancel a review (#7454)
- Fixes #7152 - If a review no longer has any pending comments, remove that review from the database. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7454 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Leni Kadali <lenikadali@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Leni Kadali <lenikadali@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
Benedikt Straub
|
cf03286b5b |
Replace the 'relative-time' element scripting with custom, translatable rewrite (#6154)
This is my take to fix #6078 Should also resolve #6111 As far as I can tell, Forgejo uses only a subset of the relative-time functionality, and as far as I can see, this subset can be implemented using browser built-in date conversion and arithmetic. So I wrote a JavaScript to format the relative-time element accordingly, and a Go binding to generate the translated elements. This is my first time writing Go code, and my first time coding for a large-scale server application, so please tell me if I'm doing something wrong, or if the whole approach is not acceptable. --- Screenshot: Localized times in Low German  Screenshot: The same with Forgejo in English  --- ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6154 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de> Co-committed-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de> |
||
Beowulf
|
37d566bdb0 |
Show if commit is signed in activity feed and unify sha box (#6933)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Old activities are shown like before, new commits are displayed like commits in e.g. the commits list. _(Second commit)_ | New signed commits | Old (signed) commits | |:--:|:--:| |  |  | Additionally the sha box was moved in an own component to unify the usage. _(First commit)_ Closes #1824 <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - User Interface features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6933): <!--number 6933 --><!--line 0 --><!--description U2hvdyBpZiBjb21taXQgaXMgdmVyaWZpZWQgaW4gYWN0aXZpdHkgZmVlZCBvZiBhbiB1c2VyIG9yIGFuIG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiBmb3IgbmV3IGFjdGl2aXR5-->Show if commit is verified in activity feed of an user or an organization for new activity<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6933 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Co-committed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> |
||
|
Gusted
|
4a1487c193 |
feat: remove the legacy TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY setting (#7745)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- The way of doing conflict testing via `git apply` stems from Gogs, it was replaced in Gitea 1.18 by `git read-tree -m` which uses 3-way merge [^0]. The option to disable the fallback `git apply` was introduced in Gitea 1.19 and enabled by default [^1]. - Given it was mostly kept just in case `git read-tree -m` was shown to be unreliable and it has been sufficiently battle tested with no known issues (in Forgejo), it's time to remove this way of conflict testing. I am not aware of anyone using this option or having any benefits over a 3-way merge via `git read-tree -m`. [^0]: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18004 [^1]: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22130 <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Breaking features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7745): <!--number 7745 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cmVtb3ZlIHRoZSBsZWdhY3kgYFRFU1RfQ09ORkxJQ1RJTkdfUEFUQ0hFU19XSVRIX0dJVF9BUFBMWWAgc2V0dGluZw==-->remove the legacy `TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY` setting<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7745 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
Remo Senekowitsch
|
ec076e66d8 |
feat: use git-replay for rebasing (#7527)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Closes #7525 This is better for performance, because it can do more work in-memory. It also preserves unknown headers, which can be important for some clients. For example, Jujutsu uses a non-standard "change-id" header to track commits across rebase and amend, but regular git-rebase drops such unknown headers. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7527 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@buenzli.dev> Co-committed-by: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@buenzli.dev> |
||
|
Gusted
|
df5d656827 |
feat: consider WebAuthn & SSH for instance signing (#7693)
- Currently the options `pubkey` and `twofa` only consider TOTP and GPG keys respectively. Adjust the code to also consider WebAuthn credentials and SSH keys. - While adding the new unified functions I noticed that certain places also benefited from using these unified functions and took the liberty (where it was either a trivial translation or it was covered under testing) to use the new unified functions. - Resolves forgejo/forgejo#7658 - Adds unit and integration tests. Documentation PR: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1166 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7693 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
|
christopher-besch
|
386e7f8208 |
send mail on failed or recovered workflow run (#7509)
Some checks are pending
/ release (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Send a Mail when an action run fails or a workflow recovers. This PR depends on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7491 closes #3719 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7509): <!--number 7509 --><!--line 0 --><!--description c2VuZCBtYWlsIG9uIGZhaWxlZCBvciByZWNvdmVyZWQgd29ya2Zsb3cgcnVu-->send mail on failed or recovered workflow run<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7509 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
|
christopher-besch
|
95ad7d6201 |
better comments and variable names for ActionRunNowDone (#7697)
Document a bit more clearly what the difference between the parameters to `sendActionRunNowDoneNotificationIfNeeded` and `ActionRunNowDone` are: `priorState`, `run`, `lastRun`, `updatedRun`. The new variable names should be more explicit and consistent. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7697 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
|
Earl Warren
|
055fc6e0c3 |
chore: tune down remote user promotion debug message shown as error (#7687)
It is not an error for a remote user to not be promoted: this is the case for all users created via OAuth. Displaying an error is confusing to the admin when seen in the logs. Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7681 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7687 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
|
Gusted
|
00761a15d1 |
chore: simplify GetDiff (#7682)
- Split `GetDiff` into two functions, `GetDiffSimple` and `GetDiffFull`. The former will do the bare minimum and really only get a Git diff while the latter does some extra stuff that's relevant for the frontend to show extra relevant.
- Use `GetDiffSimple` for API related calls, as they do not benefit nor are returning the extra information that `GetDiffFull` provides, this should show a measurable performance increase for API calls that returns commits and `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files`.
- `GetDiffSimple` contains extra code comments about its interesting way to determine the before commit.
- Add unit tests to demonstrates that the logic for determining the before commit didn't change and the function still yields correct information.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7682
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
|
||
|
Earl Warren
|
7e489eed25 |
chore: merge tests.AddFixtures and unittest.OverrideFixtures (#7648)
The only parameter that is ever used is a single directory, make it that only instead of a more complex option structure. Remove tests.AddFixtures that was the simpler form because it is now redundant. --- Backporting to v11.0 will help with automated backporting of bug fixes in need of custom made fixtures. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7648 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org> |
||
|
christopher-besch
|
05273fa8d2 |
Actions Done Notification (#7491)
This PR depends on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7510 This PR renames UpdateRunJob to UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification and UpdateRun to UpdateRunWithoutNotification and implements wrapper functions that also call the new ActionRunNowDone notification when needed. This PR can be reviewed commit-by-commit. # Things to Test - [x] GetRunBefore - [ ] integration test for sendActionRunNowDoneNotificationIfNeeded, UpdateRun and UpdateRunJob ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Co-authored-by: nobody <nobody@example.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7491 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
0ko
|
a0c9e81611 |
feat(ui): redesign migration selection screen (#6795)
Ref https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/9. Changes: * Updated SVGs which had inconsistent paddings making them look off * Better usability on mobile * Better space efficiency on desktop, up to 4 columns * Nice responsive design * Less bland look on desktop. The borders were already here but invisible in Forgejo dark theme Preview: * https://codeberg.org/attachments/3c9e10ae-3315-46e5-b8bb-8021f6fd8936 * https://codeberg.org/attachments/8196ad89-5ab6-443a-98ce-a70dcc75bca9 * https://codeberg.org/attachments/24f52a14-2ac4-4949-8108-55c34bd3c650 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6795 Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> |
||
Gusted
|
78e56ee2f7 |
[gitea] week 2025-15 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo) (#7538)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7538 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> |