- Instead of generating a patch and parsing its contents, use a faster and simple way to get it via `--shortstat`.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8725
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7682
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration test.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8756
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This reverts commit e271c24100.
It was an experiment to verify that adding a delay to the test make a difference. But it does not so... reverting.
@jerger before engaging in a refactor, it is necessary to get to the bottom of this:
- Find the root cause of those failures
- Fix it in a minimal way
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8274#issuecomment-5987215
---
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/92182/jobs/9
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/92182/jobs/10
```
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation (11.34s)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:46 ...les/storage/local.go:33:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/gitea-lfs-meta
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...ypub/reqsignature.go:76:func1() [W] verifyHttpSignatures failed: neither "Signature" nor "Authorization" have signature parameters
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET http://127.0.0.1:3002/api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2 for test-mock:12345, 400 Bad Request in 5.3ms @ activitypub/reqsignature.go:74(activitypub.ReqHTTPUserOrInstanceSignature)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...ces/auth/httpsign.go:70:Verify() [W] Failed authentication attempt from 127.0.0.1:43244
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:55 ...eb/routing/logger.go:68:func1() [W] router: slow GET /api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2 for 127.0.0.1:43244, elapsed 3684.7ms @ activitypub/reqsignature.go:74(activitypub.ReqHTTPUserOrInstanceSignature)
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/SignedRequest (5.01s)
api_federation_httpsig_test.go:50:
Error Trace: /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/integration/api_federation_httpsig_test.go:50
Error: Received unexpected error:
Get "http://127.0.0.1:3002/api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Test: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/SignedRequest
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/ValidateCaches (0.00s)
api_federation_httpsig_test.go:64:
Error Trace: /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/integration/api_federation_httpsig_test.go:64
Error: Expected value not to be nil.
Test: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/ValidateCaches
test_utils.go:247: PrepareTestEnv:Process "GET: /api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2" cancelled
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x4cc464a]
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8705
Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- If the doer isn't a issue/pull writer, return a error.
- Fixes a panic (NPE), because the callers of `prepareForReplaceOrAdd` simply checked if there was a error returned to see if the user was allowed. It didn't check if a statuscode was written. This is specifically a issue when the automatic token by Forgejo actions is used.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8690
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
regression of !8239
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8689
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Fixes#8639.
For your convenience this PR is made via AGit for you to see the issue directly in Codeberg ^^
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
I am not sure how to best write a unit test for this. It looks like there isn't any AGit PR in the default test database. The integration test in `test/integration/pull_review_test.go` creates one by manually running Git commands. I could just copy all that code to do the same in another test, but I feel bad about duplicating this. Can they be sensibly migrated to some helpers module that can be reused across tests? Or can we add an AGit PR to the test database? Or can we modify the `Flow` attribute of a PR in a test just for the sake of simulating that it's an AGit one?
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8642
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu>
Co-committed-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu>
- If a repository only has the 'manual merge' strategy allowed, the mergebox should still be shown.
- The condition that checks if all merge strategies are disabled didn't check for the manual merge strategy.
- Add a integration test that demonstrates this fix is effective.
Reported-by: apteryx
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8681
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Even though the test file contains some good extensive testing, it didn't bother to actually call `/login/oauth/access_token` to see if the received code actually resulted into a access token.
- The fix itself is... well yeah self-explanatory.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8669
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8678
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
The template module now holds the **Template** context, this makes it possible for (render) function in the template module to access functions and share data between render functions.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8663
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Introduces a new sort parameter to the `/users/search` API endpoint, similar to the one that already exists for the `/admin/users` endpoint.
Resolves#8499
Co-authored-by: DebuggerAndrzej <redpandaworkstation@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8594
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: DebuggerAndrzej <debuggerandrzej@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: DebuggerAndrzej <debuggerandrzej@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Follow up to forgejo/forgejo#8622
- Now the converse is also tested, a rebase should have happened and the commit IDs should differ.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8635
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Do not try to rebase a pull request when it is zero commits behind. We can trust this number as before merging a repository the status of the pull request is mergeable and thus not in a conflict checking stage (where this would be updated).
- This resolves a issue where `git-replay` would rebase a pull request when this is not needed and causes to lose the signature of Git commits and commit IDs as shown in the pullrequest commits timeline.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8619
- Add a simple integration test that simply checks that after merging a up-to-date pull request via the rebase style that the commit ID didn't change. This demonstrates that it didn't do needlessly rebasing.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8622
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Add links to review request targets in issue comments
- Fix links to ghost users/orgs/teams to be empty
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8239
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Related: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6977/files#diff-fd05eba523810d46c7763db938ad5839372a074a, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3949, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7906
* use the new noJS dropdown for extra actions in org view (currently only includes report button)
* this required some refactoring of the area because the said dropdown was not built to be placed in an area where `font-size:36px` is forced onto everything
* this greatly improves consistently with user profiles which now use this type of dropdown
* I decided against making the opener button mimicrate an actual button because it looks ok as is and is consitent with menu in user profiles and because I don't think this is a good design language to make a kebab menu opener look this way
* add icon to the entry
* add atom entry
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8572
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035):
`5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports`
There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot).
- Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**:
`2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.`
But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details).
---
Follow-up of !6977
### See also:
- forgejo/design#30
---
This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s).
The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini).
Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
This commit has the following:
* partial port of changes from [gitea#35053](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/35053) ([corresponding WCP](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8591))
* some changes were applied
* some strings we've fixed ourself before
* some strings we don't have
* a few fixes I wanted to propose but didn't want to dedicate a PR just to add a full stop to one string
Co-authored-by: DJ Phoenix <dikejoshua@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8593
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
This change is very similar to what was done in forgejo/forgejo#7727. When a PR is updated, `checkIfPRContentChanged` is called to check if the diff changed - this is done on a temporary repository. This change improves this checking by doing this operation on the bare repository. The change is split into several commits.
The following changes were made (in this exact order)
1. Update the `getTestPatchCtx` function that was introduced in forgejo/forgejo#7727 so it can be used outside the context of conflict checking. This is a simple change by making the caller determine if it can use a bare repository or not.
2. Do a small refactor of `ValidatePullRequest` to avoid indentation hell in this function, this is purely a refactor but necessary to not blow my brain while working on this function.
3. The first enhancement, introduce `testPatchCtx` in `ValidatePullRequest` to get diverging commits via the bare repository.
4. The main enhancement, do a refactor to move the function to be part of the repository struct and do a rename as this fits as a general purpose function. This refactoring includes it no longer being specific to a temporary repository and works on a bare repository.
5. Add extensive units tests, integration tests are added in forgejo/forgejo#8450 it checks that both calls to `CheckIfDiffDiffers` work. Because it also fixes a bug I sent it as a different PR.
6. Extend the integration test to check for diffs with commits from different repositories, to demonstrate that `getTestPatchCtx` works (specifically the `env` variable).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8451
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Adds the ability to selectively choose which branches are pushed to a mirror.
This change adds an additional text box on the repository settings for each push mirror. Existing behavior is preserved when the field is left blank.
When the repository is being pushed, only branches matching the comma separated branch filter are pushed.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7242
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7823
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Paul Campbell <pcampbell@kemitix.net>
Co-committed-by: Paul Campbell <pcampbell@kemitix.net>
closes#7946
- The `rpmsRepoPattern` regex has been fixed to handle releases with dots correctly. For example, the version `0.9.0-alt1.git.17.g2ba905d` is valid, just like `0.1.0-1.n1` mentioned in the issue (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7946#issue-1628991)
- getEntries now returns entry names. In the integration tests, there were lines like:
```go
assert.Equal(t, []string{"", ""}, result.ProvideNames)
```
and it’s unclear how such test logic could have ever worked correctly (fixes problems with deps https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7946#issuecomment-5109795)
- ALT is an acronym for ALT Linux Team, so `Alt` was replaced with `ALT`. Strictly speaking, it should probably be `ALT Linux`, but since we use `Arch` instead of `Arch Linux`, this seems fine. Also, Distrowatch shows `Arch`/`ALT` in its dropdown, so it’s consistent.
- The strings `"Alt Linux Team"` and `"Sisyphus"` in the `Origin` and `Suite` fields have been replaced with `setting.AppName` and `"Unknown"`. `Unknown` is a valid value and is set by default, so this won’t cause any issues.
- The documentation link has been fixed: (404 docs.gitea.com/usage/packages/alt/ -> 200 forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/packages/alt/)
---
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8475
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Slipenko <maks1ms@altlinux.org>
Co-committed-by: Maxim Slipenko <maks1ms@altlinux.org>
When a user is assigning an issue or PR to another user, an entry is posted in the issue comment list. This PR adds a link to the one assigning the issue. Additionally, tests for preventing XSS vulnerabilities in label rendering were added.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8264
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
The argument order for `ValidatePullRequest` is to first give the new commitID and then the old commit ID.
This results in reviews not being marked as stale when they are not stale and reviews as not stale when they are stale. The test will fail if the fix is not present.
Add testing for the following three scenarios:
1. A review is made, the PR is updated and as a consequence the PR's diff is changed. The review is now marked as stale.
2. A review is made but in the meantime the PR is updated and the review is submitted on a older commit ID. If the diff changed the review is marked as stale.
3. A review that was made against a older commit ID is no longer marked as stale if the PR is force-pushed to that older commit ID.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8450
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
As discussed in forgejo/forgejo#8274
A workaround till analysis of test timeouts helped us to fix the root cause.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8395
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
- If a Forgejo has disabled being a OAuth2 provider via `[oauth2].ENABLED = false` then return 'Not found' when clients requests `.well-known/openid-configuration` to reflect that OAuth2 is not supported.
- This allows clients to query if Forgejo has OAuth2 enabled.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#6978
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8426
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- Make the migration to add an index a noop - do not remove it as it would break v12.next & v13.next
- Keep the logic that relies on finding the last run, only always fail to find which is the same as assuming each run is one of a kind
Refs forgejo/forgejo#8373
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8374
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
This PR is part of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4767
It improves the signature handling:
1. move logic to a service (might be used from other services as well)
2. make a clear difference between ` ReqHTTPUserSignature` and `ReqHTTPUserOrInstanceSignature`
3. improve test ability (activitypub/client & distant_federation_server_mock
Adjust instance actor
1. name &
2. webfinger
## Strategy for next PRs is
Integration tests are in the driving seat.
I will step by step add integration tests form original PR and add code required by the integration test changes.
## Meta
Proposal howto process large PRs can be discussed here: https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/federation/pulls/37
Current state with rendered diagrams can be found here: https://codeberg.org/meissa/federation/src/branch/merge-large-pr/doc/merge-large-pr.md
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8275
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
This adds pasted images to the dropzone to provide the same experience
as when using the dropzone. This gives the possibility to preview and
delete the image. Additionally it provides a copy button to copy the
markdown code for inserting the image.
Removed the old implementation in `repo-legacy.js` and generalized
everything in `common-global.js` as common implementation.
Replaced old jquery code with plain JS.
Fixes#4588
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- I have seen multiple times where a test function tries to prepare the
testing environment more than once, this can lead to bugs and false
positives of testing code. I would attribute this to lack of
documentation on how to write integration tests.
- To detect such cases, keep track when we are in a prepared test
environment and fail when some testing code is tries to once again
prepare the test environment.
- The message is logged to the function call that is requesting to
prepare the test environment, for example: `change_default_branch_test.go:19: Cannot prepare a test environment if you are already in a test environment. This is a bug in your testing code.`
A example of what this will be able to catch, 6226f464ce:
```go
func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
defer PrepareTestEnv(t)()
t.Run("Bar", func(t *testing.T) {
defer PrepareTestEnv(t)() // Should very likely be PrintCurrentTest
})
}
```
```go
func TestBar(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, _ *url.URL) {
defer PrepareTestEnv(t)() // Already called by onGiteaRun.
})
}
```
```go
func TestFooBar(t *testing.T) {
defer PrepareTestEnv(t)() // This will be called by onGiteaRun later on and very unlikely to do this before the call to onGiteaRun.
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, _ *url.URL) {
// [...]
})
}
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8352
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Fixes#8329
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8330
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6053
Adds the repository description to the "alt" tag of the OpenGraph summary card, improving accessibility when these images are displayed. Fixes#8192.
Other summary cards, for issues and releases, are not modified as they already contain the issue title or release title, which seems reasonable.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8325
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
- Resolvesforgejo/discussions#324
- Remove all checks of `CheckGitVersionAtLeast` that checked for a version below 2.34.1
- The version was chosen because Debian stable supports 2.39.5 and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS supports 2.34.1
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8328
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
- fix: API must use headGitRepo instead of ctx.Repo.GitRepo for comparing
- fix: make API /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/{basehead} work with forks
- add test coverage for both fixes and the underlying function `parseCompareInfo`
- refactor and improve part of the helpers from `tests/integration/api_helper_for_declarative_test.go`
- remove a few wrong or misleading comments
Refs forgejo/forgejo#7978
## Note on the focus of the PR
It was initially created to address a regression introduced in v12. But the tests that verify it is fixed discovered a v11.0 bug. They cannot conveniently be separated because they both relate to the same area of code that was previously not covered by any test.
## Note on v11.0 backport
It must be manually done by cherry-picking all commits up to and not including `fix: API must use headGitRepo instead of ctx.Repo.GitRepo for comparing` because it is v12 specific.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8326
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- When doing CRUD actions, the commiter and author are reconstructed and
do not contain the doer's ID. Make sure to pass this ID along so it can
be used to verify the rules of instance signing for CRUD actions.
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#7693. It seems that previously this
didn't work correctly as it would not care about a empty ID.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8278
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8304
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Closes: #8293
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8296
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Schwiderski <lucas@lschwiderski.de>
Co-committed-by: Lucas Schwiderski <lucas@lschwiderski.de>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
Related: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3950#issue-785253, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3950#issuecomment-1998551.
## Links in dropdown
* move _admin only_ User details link here, give it always-visible text
* add new _self only_ Edit profile link here
* move RSS feed link here
* add new Atom feed link here, previously unadvertised
* add new SSH keys link here (`.keys`), previously unadvertised
* add new GPG keys link here (`.gpg`), previously unadvertised
* move Block/Unblock button here
* move Report abuse link here
If primary action is available (Follow/Unfollow), dropdown with more actions goes after it. If not, it is in line with followers, in place where RSS feed button used to be.
## New dropdown
Related: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/23, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3853, https://codeberg.org/0ko/forgejo/issues/2.
Implemented a new dropdown: noJS-usable, JS-enhanced for better keyboard navigation and a11y.
Styling is mostly same as the existing ones have, but row density depends on `@media` pointer type.
My choice of CSS properties have been influenced of these:
* 72a3adb16b
* 51dd2293ca
Inspired-by: KiranMantha <kiranv.mantha@gmail.com>
Inspired-by: Lucas Larroche <lucas@larroche.com>
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7906
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
add links to the comments that appear in issue when changing milestones and projects
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7992
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Two pull requests were merged at the same time
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7699
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7508
And added conflicting structs ActionRun modules/structs. That broke
the forgejo development branch and a quick fix was made to resolve
the name conflict.
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8066
However that creates an undesirable duplication of two structures that
serve the same purpose but are different.
- Remove RepoActionRun and replace it with ActionRun
- convert.ToActionRun has one more argument, the doer, because it
is determined differently in the context of webhooks or API
### Tests
- No need because the two pull requests involved already have good coverage.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8250
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: klausfyhn <klausfyhn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
testing-integration / test-unit (push) Waiting to run
testing-integration / test-sqlite (push) Waiting to run
testing / backend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / frontend-checks (push) Waiting to run
testing / test-unit (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-e2e (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redis) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (valkey) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (garnet) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-remote-cacher (redict) (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-mysql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-pgsql (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / test-sqlite (push) Blocked by required conditions
testing / security-check (push) Blocked by required conditions
The text should be two sentences, or at the very least separated by a semicolon rather than a comma.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8197
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: John Veness <john-codeberg@jveness.co.uk>
Co-committed-by: John Veness <john-codeberg@jveness.co.uk>
* Add the `notify-email` column / NotifyEmail to ActionRun and set it:
* services/actions/workflows.go `Dispatch`
* services/actions/schedule_tasks.go `CreateScheduleTask`
* services/actions/notifier_helper.go `handleWorkflows`
* Only send an email if the workflow has `enable-email-notifications: true` by having `MailActionRun` return immediately if `NotifyEmail` is false.
* Ignore or silently fail on `enable-email-notifications: true` parsing errors. Reporting such errors belongs in workflow validation, not when it is evaluated for the notifications.
* Add unit and integration tests.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8187
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8242
Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
