mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2025-08-08 12:16:45 +02:00
d74c9daa8a
As far as I can see and tell, the newest webkit version contains a regression that makes this specific test fail. The screenshots that are uploaded upon failure do not seem to suggest that this test should fail. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8611 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
18 lines
763 B
TypeScript
18 lines
763 B
TypeScript
// @watch start
|
|
// web_src/css/markup/**
|
|
// @watch end
|
|
|
|
import {expect} from '@playwright/test';
|
|
import {save_visual, test} from './utils_e2e.ts';
|
|
|
|
test('markup with #xyz-mode-only', async ({page}, workerInfo) => {
|
|
test.skip(['webkit', 'Mobile Safari'].includes(workerInfo.project.name), 'Newest version contains a regression');
|
|
const response = await page.goto('/user2/repo1/issues/1');
|
|
expect(response?.status()).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
const comment = page.locator('.comment-body>.markup', {hasText: 'test markup light/dark-mode-only'});
|
|
await expect(comment).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(comment.locator('[src$="#gh-light-mode-only"]')).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(comment.locator('[src$="#gh-dark-mode-only"]')).toBeHidden();
|
|
await save_visual(page);
|
|
});
|